Archive for the ‘Journal Publishing’ Category

A message from the incoming Editor-in-Chief

Wednesday, November 12th, 2014

I am very honored and excited to be the new JAWRA Editor-in-Chief (EIC). As I assume the role of editor-in-chief, JAWRA is very healthy. With a steadily increasing impact factor, JAWRA’s wide range of articles encompasses the biophysical and human dimensions of water systems. My goal is for JAWRA to continue to grow in rigor and influence so that it is prepared to contribute to the world’s ever-increasing water resources challenges.
I have been blessed to have a wide range of water resources experiences during my career. After working for three and half years as an assistant professor of forest hydrology at Oklahoma State University, I went to work for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development in Corvallis, OR. During my 28 year career with EPA, I led a wide range of interdisciplinary research efforts ranging from the effects of acidic deposition on aquatic ecosystems to connectivity within stream and river systems. My colleagues and I have published the results of this work extensively. I am currently a research and consulting hydrologist residing in Redding, California. I am also a courtesy faculty member in the College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences at Oregon State University.

– Jim Wigington

New JAWRA Editor-in-Chief named

Saturday, November 1st, 2014

At its meeting this afternoon the AWRA Board of Directors approved the appointment of Parker J. (Jim) Wigington as the new JAWRA Editor-in-Chief, effective January 1, 2015.

I am absolutely delighted with this selection.  I will invite Jim to post his qualifications here, but let me say Jim is the ideal person to carry on the progress we have made over the past decade.  Jim and I already have been working towards a smooth transition. Congratulations, Jim!

Copy editing

Friday, October 24th, 2014

One of the advantages of publishing in a high-quality journal is you get professional copy editing. Like a new car dealer, we want your paper to shine when you bring it out on the street!

During the review process, we strive to make sure your meaning is clear. Once we reach that point, our partners at Wiley can handle minor grammar corrections.  Keep in mind, though, our copy editors are English majors, not hydrologists! So, it’s very important to read the proof copy to make sure they have not inadvertently changed your meaning.

We appreciate reviewers showing authors how better organization may help bring out the point of a paper. And, we certainly need to know if the English is so bad it will cause problems for our copy editors. However, it generally is not necessary for a reviewer to provide detailed copy editing; it only duplicates a service we already provide.

 

What is the most rewarding experience as Editor?

Monday, September 15th, 2014

[Another in the series on editing.]

That’s easy: When reviewers take a good manuscript and provide comments that make it a great manuscript!

What is the most distasteful experience in editing?

Monday, September 15th, 2014

[Another in the series on editing.]

Doesn’t happen often, but dealing with ethical issues is the worst. Once a red flag is raised, it gets my complete attention. Perhaps it’s to our disadantage, but we in the water field are not afflicted with the big-bucks research pressure and temptations like medical research. However, we still have problems of “honorary” authorship, duplicate submissions, and plagiarism. There are no winners when these situations are discovered.

Speaking of plagiarism, it’s amazing how stupid some authors can be. Our Associate Editors and our reviewers follow the literature quite thoroughly. We also have tools available to us for cross-checking manuscripts.

How has ScholarOne Manuscripts™ changed your workflow?

Monday, September 15th, 2014

[Another in the series on editing.]

I became Editor in 2006, and we switched to ScholarOne Manuscripts™ in 2007, so I’ve seen both sides. There is no comparison: it’s John Henry against the steam drill. First year, the new system knocked seven weeks off our time-to-first decision. I consider this a major competitive advantage in attracting quality submissions.

I’ve heard some criticism in the publishing blogs about authors becoming frustrated by the automated systems, unable to get timely help. JAWRA Managing Editor Susan Scalia, however, has been wonderful in helping steer everybody smoothly through the system. I think we’ve struck a good balance between automation and a personal touch.

How important are Featured Collections?

Wednesday, September 10th, 2014

[Another in the series on editing.]

A featured collection is a group of 3 or more related papers on a topic organized by guest associate editors and published together in an issue. Most Featured Collections are connected to an AWRA conference. I work closely with conference organizers to make this happen. The conference connection allows top authors to present cutting-edge research in an oral presentation and follow up with a fully peer-reviewed paper.

More so than most journals, JAWRA is intimately tied to our Association’s conference program. I’d even say Featured Collections are our signature characteristic, a key publishing advantage. Papers in Featured Collections are cited at about twice the rate of papers not in collections.

 

How do you deal with the many science fields in a multidisciplinary journal?

Monday, September 8th, 2014

[Another in our series on editing.]

The Associate Editors have the real specialized knowledge. My job is to manage the process. I’m watching to see that the reviewers give thoughtful and constructive comments, that the authors respond diligently to the reviews, and that the Associate Editor’s recommendation critically evaluates the comments. If all these folks do their job, my job becomes easy!

How is the Boggess Award selected each year?

Tuesday, August 26th, 2014

[Another in the series on editing.]

Selecting the winner is one of the more enjoyable aspects of my job. In Spring, I ask the Associate Editors for nominations, and nominate some myself. We then go through a series of ballots eliminating the less popular until a clear winner emerges.

The final ballot usually comes down to 2-4 finalists, all excellent papers. Recently, I’ve published the finalists in my blog to give them some degree of recognition

Once we select a winner, I send the name to Ken Reid, who prepares a letter by the President announcing the winner. The award is presented during the luncheon at the AWRA Annual Conference.

Why will the new Editor be titled Editor-in-Chief?

Monday, August 25th, 2014

[Another in my series on editing.]

There’s no real change, just a new title. Modern usage would call this position, “Editor-in-Chief” to reflect its managerial responsibilities. ”Editor” as used today  typically connotes actual manuscript markup, something I rarely need to do myself.

We probably should have changed the title some time ago. But, I figured if “Editor” worked for Randy Boggess, it was good enough for me. With the coming changeover, it’s time to correct the title.