<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Rule on Compensatory Mitigation &#8211; See Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/04/11/compensatory-mitigation-hot-off-the-presses-httpwwwusacearmymilcwcecworegnewsfinal_mitig_rulepdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/04/11/compensatory-mitigation-hot-off-the-presses-httpwwwusacearmymilcwcecworegnewsfinal_mitig_rulepdf/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob pierce</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/04/11/compensatory-mitigation-hot-off-the-presses-httpwwwusacearmymilcwcecworegnewsfinal_mitig_rulepdf/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>bob pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/04/11/compensatory-mitigation-hot-off-the-presses-httpwwwusacearmymilcwcecworegnewsfinal_mitig_rulepdf/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I like the final mitigation regs found at 33 CFR 332. They are a great improvement over the draconian draft that was propsed a couple of years ago. The allow the flexibility that is required for the DE to get the greatest bang for the buck and at the same time recognize that there can be permitted projects that will not require compensatory mitigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the final mitigation regs found at 33 CFR 332. They are a great improvement over the draconian draft that was propsed a couple of years ago. The allow the flexibility that is required for the DE to get the greatest bang for the buck and at the same time recognize that there can be permitted projects that will not require compensatory mitigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

