<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Need a National Policy: Is &#8216;Ground Water&#8217; One Word or Two?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Herman</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-26481</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Herman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-26481</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me started.  While googling for an authoritative reference on the spelling of &quot;ground water&quot; or &quot;storm water,&quot; I came across Dr. Campana&#039;s post.

Dr. Stan Davis taught that &quot;ground water&quot; is two words.  As far as I know, the USGS standard is also &quot;ground water.&quot;  On a related matter, I believe a two-word noun should be hyphenated when used as an adjective.

It will be &quot;ground water&quot; and &quot;storm water&quot; for me until the day that &quot;surface water&quot; is spelled as one word, or pigs fly -- whichever comes first.

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me started.  While googling for an authoritative reference on the spelling of &#8220;ground water&#8221; or &#8220;storm water,&#8221; I came across Dr. Campana&#8217;s post.</p>
<p>Dr. Stan Davis taught that &#8220;ground water&#8221; is two words.  As far as I know, the USGS standard is also &#8220;ground water.&#8221;  On a related matter, I believe a two-word noun should be hyphenated when used as an adjective.</p>
<p>It will be &#8220;ground water&#8221; and &#8220;storm water&#8221; for me until the day that &#8220;surface water&#8221; is spelled as one word, or pigs fly &#8212; whichever comes first.</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annieR</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-13291</link>
		<dc:creator>annieR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-13291</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ground water&quot; could conceivably be misunderstood by a non-native English speaker.  &quot;Groundwater,&quot; not likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ground water&#8221; could conceivably be misunderstood by a non-native English speaker.  &#8220;Groundwater,&#8221; not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>I agree that we should save space and use &quot;groundwater.&quot;  

Also to save space, can we use &quot;hydrologic&quot; instead of &quot;hydrological?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we should save space and use &#8220;groundwater.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Also to save space, can we use &#8220;hydrologic&#8221; instead of &#8220;hydrological?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Spangenberg</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Spangenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>Mike -

Seems to me that I read somewhere that when used as an adjective (as in &quot;groundwater quality&quot;) the phrase is one word, while when referring to the material itself, (as in &quot;the ground water resource&quot;), the useage is two words.

Earl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike -</p>
<p>Seems to me that I read somewhere that when used as an adjective (as in &#8220;groundwater quality&#8221;) the phrase is one word, while when referring to the material itself, (as in &#8220;the ground water resource&#8221;), the useage is two words.</p>
<p>Earl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquadoc</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquadoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>Hi, folks.

Thanks for your comments. Just further proof that the big issues don&#039;t elude us here!

Lisa - I like your solution.

L. Kelly -I agree, but think we&#039;re a long way off. 

Jane - your comment reminds me of an episode 25 years ago. I was writing a proposal with a consulting geologist. He asked me to proof the final draft, and when I returned it, he noted that wherever he had written &quot;permeability&quot;, I had crossed it out and inserted &quot;hydraulic conductivity&quot;.

I gently explained to him that &quot;hydraulic conductivity&quot; had supplanted &quot;permeability&quot; as the preferred term. &quot;Silly me! Why use one word when two will do?&quot; was his response.

I kept my mouth shut after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, folks.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. Just further proof that the big issues don&#8217;t elude us here!</p>
<p>Lisa &#8211; I like your solution.</p>
<p>L. Kelly -I agree, but think we&#8217;re a long way off. </p>
<p>Jane &#8211; your comment reminds me of an episode 25 years ago. I was writing a proposal with a consulting geologist. He asked me to proof the final draft, and when I returned it, he noted that wherever he had written &#8220;permeability&#8221;, I had crossed it out and inserted &#8220;hydraulic conductivity&#8221;.</p>
<p>I gently explained to him that &#8220;hydraulic conductivity&#8221; had supplanted &#8220;permeability&#8221; as the preferred term. &#8220;Silly me! Why use one word when two will do?&#8221; was his response.</p>
<p>I kept my mouth shut after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Rowan</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>Mike, I am for saving energy and space, so, if we can form two words into one and everyone understands what the word means, sobeit.  ;&gt;)

Now, distinguishing the floodway and the riparian zone, this has become a problem (if you catch my drift).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I am for saving energy and space, so, if we can form two words into one and everyone understands what the word means, sobeit.  ;>)</p>
<p>Now, distinguishing the floodway and the riparian zone, this has become a problem (if you catch my drift).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Kelly</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>L Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>What a great idea to seek a common name.  Many of us in the water business struggle on terminology (i.e. Storm Water, stormwater, reuse, recycled water, reclaimed water, microconstituents, emerging contaminants, etc).  Standardization of terms is one way we can help communicate our information to our publics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great idea to seek a common name.  Many of us in the water business struggle on terminology (i.e. Storm Water, stormwater, reuse, recycled water, reclaimed water, microconstituents, emerging contaminants, etc).  Standardization of terms is one way we can help communicate our information to our publics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://awramedia.org/mainblog/2008/09/02/we-need-a-national-debate-is-ground-water-one-word-or-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awramedia.org/mainblog/?p=54#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation.  I have been working on publications and can never figure out which to use.  I will use either or maybe just grundwasser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation.  I have been working on publications and can never figure out which to use.  I will use either or maybe just grundwasser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

